Description

Description by Liu Shengwen 53711118

In Scenario A, we found that supervisor controlled all the process of the meeting. And the product is designed by the supervisor's personalization. If the supervisor is well-experienced, he can make the product wonderful, just like Steve Jobs. In this scenario, teammate can get order clearly and do feedback quickly. As soon as the supervisor decided, all the people only to obey it instead of wasting more time on discussing without any results. It save time and has high efficiency in carrying out the whole plan. But because of the high centralization, the innovation of teammates is limited, the advice maybe ignored and everyone desired to get power to control the team which led depressive atmosphere in office and office politics.

In Scenario B, all the people join in the passionate discussion. Everyone knows each other’s ideas, more plans have been posted. The atmosphere is harmony and active. Every participant made his efforts to optimize the product. Everyone is the designer, everyone is the supervisor. Before we made the final decision, we have made nearly 2 hours on discussing and preparing which is as 2 times as scenario A. When we get difficulties we need to have a meeting, when we have a idea we need to have a meeting and every meeting cost too much time. Maybe when we make the final decision, the dead line will meets. It has low efficiency in executing but high collaboration.